As we glance back on a succession of headlines concerning data breaches and security lapses at some of the world’s largest firms, we discover a consistent theme. Attackers have continued to enhance their techniques requiring firms to compensate and lift the bar on cybersecurity. However, there are still many gaps that CSOs should address to avoid the headlines in the future.

1. Information overload

The average company is adept at storing information but much less proficient in using it. there’s such a lot knowledge out there that many find it troublesome to separate the signal from the noise. this is solely magnified by the size and reach of today’s firms.

Some SecOps teams suffer from false positive fatigue. it’s a common complaint resulting from repeated instances where security alerts turn out to be a false alarm. False positive fatigue dulls the senses and makes teams less possible to respond with vigilance when receiving real alerts.

Companies in this condition have seen success by triaging security information. modern security software can do plenty to cut back the false positives with baselines, thresholds, and heuristics. Such systems are only as good as the data they are based on, but today’s systems can create use of significant historical and current operational data to create better decisions. This reduces the false positives and usually results in fewer false negatives as well. Such software ultimately minimizes the strain on SecOps teams, allowing them to perform at their best.

2. Insufficient / Poor integration

Another downside is the poor integration between security systems and systems management tools. companies still struggle to transform independent silos of security information into a cohesive matrix of integrated systems containing security insights and metrics. it’s not enough to deploy security systems if they do not work along. firms should additionally combat their technology sprawl, consisting of various on-premise and cloud systems. In such a complex environment, it’s easy for valuable information to fall through the cracks. this can be one issue resulting in attacker persistence on networks. Currently, attackers stay on a network for an average of 146 days before they are identified.

SecOps teams need a single dashboard that provides visibility into each of the systems. Also, the data from systems like SIEM, IAM, DLP, and IPS must be integrated, so data is normalized, consolidated, and analyzed comprehensively. additionally, standard processes can be executed across the board to make sure that no system lost in the mix.

3. Human bottlenecks

Better teamwork means more productivity for your business. Get a customized guide to improving communication with your team.

We, humans, are often a bottleneck in the incident response process. every minute following an incident probably increases the damage to the company and its customers. By the time a team is assembled, and the incident response manual is consulted, the impact may have increased severalfold. there is a time for us to step out of the way to let computers do their job.

We have spent decades developing complex response plans. now’s the time to turn those plans into workflows. The sturdy processes and procedures for handling incidents can be used to script appropriate workflows to detected and validated events. Response workflows can be executed quickly following identification to reduce damages. Incident response workflows also ensure consistency in the response. A response team can practice over and over, yet still create a blunder when the pressure is on, whereas computers can perform reliably over and over.

A recent statistic from Microsoft asserts that 63 percent of all network intrusions are because of compromised credentials. successful phishing techniques, poor password management, or lax account management security have created it way more difficult to trust credentials alone.

4. Credential trust

A recent statistic from Microsoft asserts that 63 percent of all network intrusions are due to compromised credentials. Successful phishing tactics, poor password management, or lax account management security have made it much more difficult to trust credentials alone.

The actions users perform should be evaluated for anomalies so that abnormal behavior prompts a response. There are tools available that can offer insight and action to stop successful infiltration of systems and exfiltration of data. Credentials may need to be verified once more as conditions modification such as moving to a different location, performing a unique set of tasks, or logging in at a different time. Two, three, or additional forms of authentication is used depending on the riskiness of the behavior.

5. Soft targets

It takes continual effort to remain on top of patches, best practices, and the latest hardening techniques, but these steps are important in protecting systems from vulnerabilities and other weaknesses. Even one soft target can open an organization up to attack.

Companies ought to have systems in situ to audit and verify that systems are hardened and up to date. Vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, and patch management validation tools can be used to test systems and make sure that they’re properly configured.

Seizing the opportunities

It is clear that something needs to be done currently to deal with these 5 security challenges. think about how your cybersecurity strategy can shut these gaps. establish a perfect mixture of technologies and the way those are going to be integrated to produce the foremost value, simple management, and protection. seek out automation whenever possible and build in more credential verification and behavioral analytics.

Get in touch with us:

If you’re ready to get transformed into a more secured and modern workplace, please contact us at sales@navishaa.com today.